我继承了一些我正试图优化的pandas
代码。一个DataFrame
,results
,已经用
results = pd.DataFrame(columns=['plan','volume','avg_denial_increase','std_dev_impact', 'avg_idr_increase', 'std_dev_idr_increase'])
for plan in my_df['plan_name'].unique():
df1 = df[df['plan_name'] == plan]]
df1['volume'].fillna(0, inplace=True)
df1['change'] = df1['idr'] - df1['idr'].shift(1)
df1['change'].fillna(0, inplace=True)
df1['impact'] = df1['change'] * df1['volume']
describe_impact = df1['impact'].describe()
describe_change = df1['change'].describe()
results = results.append({'plan': plan,
'volume': df1['volume'].mean(),
'avg_denial_increase': describe_impact['mean'],
'std_dev_impact': describe_impact['std'],
'avg_idr_increase': describe_change['mean'],
'std_dev_idr_increase': describe_change['std']},
ignore_index=True)
我的第一个想法是将for循环下的所有内容移动到一个单独的函数get_results_for_plan
,并使用pandas
groupby()
和apply()
方法。但事实证明,他的速度更慢。跑步
%lprun -f get_results_for_plan my_df.groupby('plan_name', sort=False, as_index=False).apply(get_results_for_plan)
退货
Timer unit: 1e-06 s
Total time: 0.77167 s
File: <ipython-input-46-7c36b3902812>
Function: get_results_for_plan at line 1
Line # Hits Time Per Hit % Time Line Contents
==============================================================
1 def get_results_for_plan(plan_df):
2 94 33221.0 353.4 4.3 plan = plan_df.iloc[0]['plan_name']
3 94 25901.0 275.5 3.4 plan_df['volume'].fillna(0, inplace=True)
4 94 75765.0 806.0 9.8 plan_df['change'] = plan_df['idr'] - plan_df['idr'].shift(1)
5 93 38653.0 415.6 5.0 plan_df['change'].fillna(0, inplace=True)
6 93 57088.0 613.8 7.4 plan_df['impact'] = plan_df['change'] * plan_df['volume']
7 93 204828.0 2202.5 26.5 describe_impact = plan_df['impact'].describe()
8 93 201127.0 2162.7 26.1 describe_change = plan_df['change'].describe()
9 93 129.0 1.4 0.0 return pd.DataFrame({'plan': plan,
10 93 21703.0 233.4 2.8 'volume': plan_df['volume'].mean(),
11 93 4291.0 46.1 0.6 'avg_denial_increase': describe_impact['mean'],
12 93 1957.0 21.0 0.3 'std_dev_impact': describe_impact['std'],
13 93 2912.0 31.3 0.4 'avg_idr_increase': describe_change['mean'],
14 93 1783.0 19.2 0.2 'std_dev_idr_increase': describe_change['std']},
15 93 102312.0 1100.1 13.3 index=[0])
我看到的最突出的问题是每行的点击量。组的数目,按
len(my_df.groupby('plan_name', sort=False, as_index=False).groups)
是72。那么,为什么这些线被击中94或93次每?(这可能与this问题有关,但在这种情况下,我希望命中计数是num_groups + 1
)
更新:在上面的%lprun
调用groupby()
中,删除sort=False
将第2-6行的行命中率降低到80,其余行的行命中率降低到79。点击率还是比我想象的要高,但好一点。你知道吗
第二个问题:有没有更好的方法来优化这个特定的代码?你知道吗
以下是我在评论中的大意:
因此,代码最大的好处可能是:
相关问题 更多 >
编程相关推荐