德扬戈：你是有效的吗？他正在改变自我.obj

Question

在我的代码中，您可以看到两个print语句。在我的表单中，以前保存在数据库中的值是emailprevious@gmail.com。我在表单中输入的新值是emailnew@gmail.com。你知道吗

我从打印报表中得到的预期结果：

emailprevious@gmail.com self.object.email
emailprevious@gmail.com self.object.email 2

实际结果：

emailprevious@gmail.com self.object.email
emailnew@gmail.com self.object.email 2

似乎self.attendee_form.is_valid(),正在改变自我客体. 我在is_valid()的Django源代码中找不到定义的行为，你能解释一下self.object为什么会改变吗？你知道吗

class AssignAttendee(SuccessMessageMixin, SingleObjectMixin, TemplateView):
    template_name = 'attendees/front/assign_attendee.html'
    success_message = _("Attendee has been successfully updated.")

    def get_object(self):
        return get_object_or_404(
            Attendee,
            ticket_reference=self.kwargs['ticket_reference'],
            ticket_code=self.kwargs['ticket_code'],
        )

    def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        self.object = self.get_object()
        return super().get(request, *args, **kwargs)

    @cached_property
    def attendee_form(self):
        return AssignAttendeeForm(
            prefix='attendee',
            data=self.request.POST or None,
            instance=self.object,
        )

    @cached_property
    def get_consent(self):
        organizer = self.object.event.organizer
        return organizer.contacts.filter(email=self.object.email).first()

    @cached_property
    def consent_form(self):
        return AttendeeConsentForm(
            prefix='consent',
            data=self.request.POST or None,
            instance=self.get_consent,
            email=self.object.email,
        )

    def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
        context = super().get_context_data(**kwargs)
        context.update({
            'attendee': self.object,
            'attendee_form': self.attendee_form,
            'consent_form': self.consent_form,
        })
        return context

    @transaction.atomic
    def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        self.object = self.get_object()

        # Check if consent already exists which defines if consent entry will be
        # updated or if a new one will be created.
        consent = self.get_consent
        print(self.object.email, "self.object.email")

        # Validate forms
        forms = [
            self.attendee_form.is_valid(),
            self.consent_form.is_valid(),
        ]

        print(self.object.email, "self.object.email 2")

        if not all(forms):
            messages.error(request, _("Please correct the errors in the form."))
        else:
            self.object = self.attendee_form.save()
            if consent:
                consent.first_name = self.object.first_name
                consent.last_name = self.object.last_name
                consent.email = self.object.email
                consent.save(
                    update_fields=['email', 'first_name', 'last_name']
                )
                consent.events.add(self.object.event)
            else:
                consent_form = self.consent_form.save(commit=False)
                consent_form.email = self.object.email
                consent_form.first_name = self.object.first_name
                consent_form.last_name = self.object.last_name
                consent_form.organizer = self.object.event.organizer
                consent_form.save()
                consent_form.events.add(self.object.event)

Answer 1

这是预期的结果。is_valid（）正在检查以确保表单有效，即满足您在模型或表单的clean方法中规定的所有要求。它用新数据更新对象，因此使用print2语句，以便您在需要时保存对象。因此，如果您更改了电子邮件地址，并且表单中没有验证错误，则根据您的post方法，当您提交表单时，对象将与新电子邮件一起保存。如果您没有调用save，那么它仍然会在您的控制台中打印新电子邮件，但当您检查db时，它将是旧电子邮件。你知道吗