Python:将大函数分解为段

2024-05-15 14:05:34 发布

您现在位置:Python中文网/ 问答频道 /正文

我正在为Reddit创建一个Bot。我目前只有一个非常大的函数,我希望创建子函数,使它更可读。你知道吗

下面是它的功能的粗略分解

def replybot():
    submissions = reversed(list(subreddit.get_new(limit=MAXPOSTS)))
    for post in submissions:
        try:
            author = post.author.name
        except AttributeError:
            print "AttributeError: Author is deleted"
            continue # Author is deleted. We don't care about this post.
        # DOES PID EXIST IN DB? IF NOT ADD IT
        cur.execute('SELECT * FROM oldposts WHERE ID=?', [pid])
        sql.commit()
        if cur.fetchone(): # Post is already in the database
            continue
        cur.execute('INSERT INTO oldposts VALUES(?)', [pid])
        sql.commit()
...

我想把代码分成几个部分,即

        try:
            author = post.author.name
        except AttributeError:
            print "AttributeError: Author is deleted"
            continue # Author is deleted. We don't care about this post.

在它自己的函数中,从replybot()中调用它,但我遇到了调用continue的问题。我得到SyntaxError: 'continue' not properly in loop

我有办法做到这一点吗?你知道吗


Tags: 函数nameinispostauthorattributeerrortry
3条回答

正如Claudiu所说,当您将内部命令分解到它自己的函数中时;它不再在循环中,您的代码将如下所示:

def isNotAuthorDeleted(post):
    try:
        author = post.author.name
        return author 
    except AttributeError:
        print "AttributeError: Author is deleted"
        return false

你的循环是:

for post in submissions:
    if not isNotAuthorDeleted(post):
        continue

如果你把一个循环的内部部分转换成它自己的函数,它就不再是一个循环了。对于函数,循环中continue的等价物是return(即提前终止此迭代(现在是函数调用)。你知道吗

再次引发错误,而不是尝试继续。或者简单地让它冒泡到主循环,或者如果您需要更好的错误处理,那么创建您自己的自定义错误。例如:

class MyNotFatalError(Exception):
    pass

def do_something():
    try:
        a, b, c = 1, 2
    except ValueError:
        raise MyNotFatalError('Something went wrong')

# In your main function
for post in submissions:
    try:
        do_something()
        do_some_other_thing()
        do_some_more()
    except MyNotFatalError as err:
        continue # we could print out the error text here
    do_some_last_thing()

这样可能更好,因为您只捕获您知道要捕获的错误,并且在出现实际错误时仍然让程序崩溃。你知道吗

如果您只是捕获了ValueError,那么它也会截获并隐藏同一类错误的所有其他可能来源。你知道吗

相关问题 更多 >