我在Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters - LeetCode上花了好几个小时
- Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters
Medium
Given a string, find the length of the longest substring without repeating characters.
Example 1:
Input: "abcabcbb" Output: 3 Explanation: The answer is "abc", with the length of 3.
Example 2:
Input: "bbbbb" Output: 1 Explanation: The answer is "b", with the length of 1.
Example 3:
Input: "pwwkew" Output: 3 Explanation: The answer is "wke", with the length of 3. Note that the answer must be a substring, "pwke" is a subsequence and not a substring.
这个问题可以用两个指针混合的kadane算法来处理子阵
class Solution:
def lengthOfLongestSubstring(self, s: str) -> int:
logging.debug(f"{list(enumerate(s))}")
slo = fas = 0 #slow as the fisrt character in a subarray which not duplicate, fast as the fast.
#relation: length = fas - slo
current = set()
glo = loc = 0
while fas < len(s):
logging.debug(f"pre_current: {current}, slow: {slo}, fast: {fas}")
if s[fas] not in current:
current.add(s[fas]
loc = fas - slo
glo = max(glo, loc)
fas +=1
else:
current.remove(s[slo])
slo += 1
logging.debug(f"post_current: {current}, slow: {slo}, fast: {fas} \n")
return glo
测试用例
^{pr2}$解决方案很清楚,可以慢一点和快一点交替进行
$ python 3.LongestSubstring.py MyCase.test_g
DEBUG [(0, 'a'), (1, 'b'), (2, 'c'), (3, 'c'), (4, 'e'), (5, 'f'), (6, 'g')]
DEBUG pre_current: set(), slow: 0, fast: 0
DEBUG post_current: {'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 1
DEBUG pre_current: {'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 1
DEBUG post_current: {'b', 'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 2
DEBUG pre_current: {'b', 'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 2
DEBUG post_current: {'b', 'c', 'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 3
DEBUG pre_current: {'b', 'c', 'a'}, slow: 0, fast: 3
DEBUG post_current: {'b', 'c'}, slow: 1, fast: 3
DEBUG pre_current: {'b', 'c'}, slow: 1, fast: 3
DEBUG post_current: {'c'}, slow: 2, fast: 3
DEBUG pre_current: {'c'}, slow: 2, fast: 3
DEBUG post_current: set(), slow: 3, fast: 3
DEBUG pre_current: set(), slow: 3, fast: 3
DEBUG post_current: {'c'}, slow: 3, fast: 4
DEBUG pre_current: {'c'}, slow: 3, fast: 4
DEBUG post_current: {'c', 'e'}, slow: 3, fast: 5
DEBUG pre_current: {'c', 'e'}, slow: 3, fast: 5
DEBUG post_current: {'e', 'f', 'c'}, slow: 3, fast: 6
DEBUG pre_current: {'e', 'f', 'c'}, slow: 3, fast: 6
DEBUG post_current: {'g', 'e', 'f', 'c'}, slow: 3, fast: 7
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.001s
综上所述,该方案采用了双指针技术和Kadane算法的思想。我假设在作为一个初学者花了几个小时调试之后,最终有可能解决这个问题。在
然而,我读到了这样一个微妙的解决方案
class SolutionA:
def lengthOfLongestSubstring(self, s):
"""
:type s: str
:rtype: int
"""
#slow is the first which not duplicate in a subarray
#fast is the last whichi not duplicate in a subarray
lookup, glo, slo, fas = {}, 0, 0, 0
for fas, ch in enumerate(s):
if ch in lookup:
slo = max(slo, lookup[ch]+1)
elif ch not in lookup:
glo = max(glo, fas-slo+1)
lookup[ch] = fas #update the duplicates and add new
return glo
这个解决方案非常聪明,我真的不相信一个人能在几个小时内设计出这样一个解决方案,如果你以前没有读过它。在
它采用了hash映射,两倍于kadane算法的思想和非常简洁的结构。在
这是一种常用的双指针技术吗?它叫什么名字
如第二种方法中对解决方案的评论所述:
它使用2个指针来跟踪没有重复字符的窗口大小。如果找到重复项,它会相应地更新指针。在
换句话说,它维护一个窗口,并进一步滑动它们,以查看它与
non-repeating characters
属性一起使用多长时间。所以,这个方法被称为sliding window technique。在对于只有26个字母字符的字符串来说,这可能看起来微不足道,但对于UTF-8类型的字符串来说,这非常有用。在
相关问题 更多 >
编程相关推荐