Mod逖wsgi vs fapws3 Djang

Question

在处理Django时，使用FAPWS3和MOD\WSGI有区别吗？在

FAPWS3在向Python脚本提供请求时似乎要快得多。我想知道我是否遗漏了什么。：）

有什么想法吗？在

Answer 1

这是我目前在网上看到的最好的解释。 http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers

引用自尼科尔·阿斯在

When you are just interested in quickly hosting your threaded application you really can’t go wrong with Apache ModWSGI. Even though Apache ModWSGI might put a little more strain on your memory requirements there is a lot to go for in terms of functionality. For example, protecting part of your website by using a LDAP server is as easy as enabling a module. Standalone CherryPy also shows great performance and functionality and is really a viable (fully Python) alternative which can lower memory requirements.

When you are a little more adventurous you can look at uWSGI and FAPWS3, they are relatively new compared to CherryPy and ModWSGI but they show a significant performance increase and do have lower memory requirements.

Answer 2

底层的web服务器不是瓶颈，它是您的应用程序和数据库访问。在实际的完整应用程序堆栈的上下文中，任何底层web服务器之间的差异都非常小或根本不存在。您不能基于helloworld类型测试来做出决定，因为它们非常无意义。因此，决策应该基于负载下托管解决方案的质量和稳定性，以及配置和支持的容易程度，包括您自己管理特定设置的能力。如果您不知道如何正确地配置和支持特定的web服务器，例如Apache，那么您为什么要使用它呢。在