我想在Racket中实现这个功能。如何在Racket中重写此函数
我的PYTHON代码
# function to check transitive relation
def is_transitive(relation):
# for all (a, b) and (b, c) in Relation ; (a, c) must belong to Relation
for a,b in relation:
for c,d in relation:
if b == c and ((a,d) not in relation):
return False
return True
transitive?
将对列表作为其唯一输入。该对列表表示一个二元关系。如果二进制关系是可传递的,则函数应返回#t
,如下所示
> (transitive? '((1 2) (2 3) (1 3)))
#t
> (transitive? '((1 3) (1 2) (2 3)))
#t
> (transitive? '((1 2) (2 3)))
#f
> (transitive? '((1 1) (1 2) (2 1) (2 2) (3 3)))
#t
> (transitive? '((1 2) (3 3) (2 2) (2 1) (1 1)))
#t
> (transitive? '((2 3) (3 3) (1 2) (1 1)))
#f
以下是我到目前为止在球拍方面所做的:
(define (get-all-relations-of x set)
(if (null? set)
'()
(if (equal? x (car (car set)))
(cons (cdr (car set))
(get-all-relations-of x (cdr set)))
(get-all-relations-of x (cdr set)))))
(define (exist-relation? r set)
(if (null? set)
#f
(if (equal? r (car set))
#t
(exist-relation? r (cdr set)))))
(define (exist-all-transitive-relations-of? x r set)
(if (null? r)
#t
(if (not (exist-relation? (cons x (car r)) set))
#f
(exist-all-transitive-relations-of? x (cdr r) set))))
(define (transitive? set)
(if (null? set)
#t
(if (and (not (null? (get-all-relations-of (cdr (car set)) set)))
(not (exist-all-transitive-relations-of?
(car (car set))
(get-all-relations-of (cdr (car set)) set)
set)))
#f
(transitive? (cdr set)))))
只有当(存在?x r集的所有传递关系)为真时,它才起作用
以下是我的输出:
>(exist-all-transitive-relations-of? 1 '(2 5 6) '((1 2) (1 5) (6 8)))))
> #t
>(define (transitive? '((1 2) (2 6)))
> #f
>(define (transitive? '((1 2) (2 6)(2 7)(1 7)))
> #f
>(define (transitive? '((1 2) (2 6)(2 7)(1 7)(1 6)))
> #t
如何修改我的代码?所以我不必单独测试(define(exist-all-transitive relations of?xr set))是否为真
以下是对您的球拍的几点评论:
当您这样做时:
您可以使用短路将其转换为
类似于
做
最后,考虑在Python中替换循环时考虑现有的列表抽象是非常重要的。在本例中,您将获取一个列表,并将其压缩为一段数据,特别是一个布尔值(如果某个成员的属性中断)。因此,您应该使用
andmap
,这将大大减少您的代码:注意:}和{}与{}和{}的关系
(,a ,d)
可以根据需要替换为(list a d)
(无准注释)。以及{相关问题 更多 >
编程相关推荐